How Moral Intensity Affects Information Disorder Behavior on Social Media
Full text | |||
Source | Journal of Information Systems Security Volume 18, Number 2 (2022)
Pages 125–139
ISSN 1551-0123 (Print)ISSN 1551-0808 (Online) |
||
Authors | Wei Xie — Walker College of Business, Appalachian State University, USA | ||
Publisher | Information Institute Publishing, Washington DC, USA |
Abstract
This study investigates information disorder behaviors, such as misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation on social media, using Jones’ Moral Intensity lens. Our central argument is that moral intensity evaluations have a contextual impact on information disorder behavior. Based on our research findings, we assert that the interpretation of the six characteristics of Moral Intensity significantly influences information disorder. This research contributes to the advancement of theories that explain online behavioral ethics, particularly in the context of information disorder behavior on social media. Our study provides valuable insights into understanding the complexity of online ethical behavior, which has become increasingly relevant in today's digital age.
Keywords
Disinformation, Misinformation, Malinformation, Moral Decision-making, Moral Intensity, Moral Philosophy.
References
Allcott, H. and Gentzkow, M. (2017). “Social media and fake news in the 2016 election,” Journal of economic perspectives, 31(2):211-236.
Bandura, A. (1999). “Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities,” Personality and social psychology review, (3:3):193-209.
Barnett, T. (2001). “Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: An empirical study,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, (31:5):1038-1057.
Bergman, R. (2004). ‘Identity as motivation: Toward a theory of the moral self,’ Moral development, self, and identity, eds. Psychology Press.
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., and Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). ‘Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, July 11.
Chia, A. and Mee, S. M. (2000). “The effects of issue characteristics on the recognition of moral issues,” Journal of Business Ethics, (27:3):255-269.
Cummings, C. L., & Kong, W. Y. (2019). Breaking Down “Fake News”: Differences Between Misinformation, Disinformation, Rumors, and Propaganda. In Resilience and Hybrid Threats, 188-204.
Davis, M. A., Johnson, N. B., and Ohmer, D. G. (1998). “Issue-contingent effects on ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison,” Journal of Business Ethics, (17:4):373-389.
Dhillon, G. S. (2002). Social responsibility in the information age: issues and controversies. Idea Group Pub.
Dhillon, G. S., (1995). Interpreting the management of information systems security. PhD Thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Dhillon, G. and Harnesk, D. (2016). Misunderstandings and Misjudgements about Security: A Dialogical Narrative Network Analysis of Global IT Offshoring. Americas Conference on Information Systems. Aug 11-14.
Dukerich, J. M., Waller, M. J., George, E., and Huber, G. P. (2000). “Moral intensity and managerial problem solving,” Journal of Business Ethics, (24:1):29-38.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Building theories from case study research,” Academy of management review, (14:4):532-550.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., and Alkassim, R. S. (2016). “Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling,” American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, (5:1):1-4.
Everett, J. A., Colombatto, C., Chituc, V., Brady, W. J., and Crockett, M. (2020). “The effectiveness of moral messages on public health behavioral intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Fallis, D. (2015). “What is disinformation?” Library Trends, (63:3):401-426.
Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., and Benkler, Y. (2017). “Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 US presidential election,” Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, (6).
Fox, C. (1983). “Information and misinformation. An investigation of the notions of information, misinformation, informing, and misinforming.”
Gentzkow, M. and Shapiro, J. M. (2006). “Media bias and reputation,” Journal of Political Economy, (114:2): 280-316.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (1989). ‘Misinformation’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, (19:4):533-550.
Haidt, J. (2001). “The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment,” Psychological Review, (108:4):814.
Harber, K. D. and Cohen, D. J. (2005). “The emotional broadcaster theory of social sharing,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, (24:4):382-400.
Jones, T. M. (1991). “Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model,” Academy of Management Review, (16:2): 366-395.
Klein, H. K. and Myers, M. D. (1999). “A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems,” MIS Quarterly, 67-93.
Kümpel, A. S., Karnowski, V., and Keyling, T. (2015). “News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks,” Social media+ society, (1:2).
Langley, A. (1999). “Strategies for theorizing from process data,” Academy of Management Review, (24:4):691-710.
Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (2007). “Naturalistic inquiry,” The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology.
Liu, Y. and Wu, Y. F. (2018). “Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (32:1).
Marwick, A. and Lewis, R. (2017). “Media manipulation and disinformation online,” Data and Society Research Institute, New York.
Mason, R. O. (1986). “Four ethical issues of the information age,” MIS Quarterly, 5-12.
McMahon, J. M. and Harvey, R. J. (2006). “An analysis of the factor structure of Jones’ moral intensity construct,” Journal of Business Ethics, (64:4):381-404.
McMahon, J. M. and Harvey, R. J. (2007). “The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment,” Journal of Business Ethics, (72:4): 335-357.
Morris, S. A. and McDonald, R. A. (1995). “The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Business Ethics, (14:9):715-726.
Myers, M. D. and Newman, M. (2007). “The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft,” Information and Organization, (17:1): 2-26.
Oyserman, D. and Dawson, A. (2020). “Your fake news, our facts: Identity-based motivation shapes what we believe, share, and accept,” The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation, 173-195.
Ross, L., Greene, D., and House, P. (1977). “The ‘false consensus effect’: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, (13:3):279-301.
Schulz, A., Wirth, W., and Müller, P. (2020). “We are the people and you are fake news: A social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions,” Communication Research, (47:2):201-226.
Shearer, E. (2021a). ‘More than eight-in-ten Americans get news from digital devices,’ Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/01/12/more-than-eight-in-ten-americans-get-news-from-digital-devices/, Pewsearch.org, 24 April, 2021.
Shearer, E. (2021b). ‘Social media outpaces print newspapers in the US as a news source,” Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/12/10/social-media-outpaces-print-newspapers-in-the-u-s-as-a-news-source/, Pewsearch.org, Accessed 24 April, 2021.
Singer, M., Mitchell, S., and Turner, J. (1998). “Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgements: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition,” Journal of Business Ethics, (17:5):527-541.
Stahl, B. C. (2006). “On the Difference or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective,” Informing Science, 9.
Stein, E. W. and Ahmad, N. (2009). “Using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to construct a measure of the magnitude of consequences component of moral intensity,” Journal of Business Ethics, (89:3):391.
Tandoc Jr, E. C., Lim, Z. W., and Ling, R. (2018). “Defining ‘fake news’ A typology of scholarly definitions,” Digital Journalism, (6:2):137-153.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., and Reynolds, S. J. (2006). “Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review,” Journal of Management, (32:6):951-990.
Tsalikis, J., Seaton, B., and Shepherd, P. (2008). “Relative importance measurement of the moral intensity dimensions,” Journal of Business Ethics, (80:3):613-626.
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., ... and Nyhan, B. (2018). “Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature,” Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature.
Valenzuela, S., Piña, M., and Ramírez, J. (2017). “Behavioral effects of framing on social media users: How conflict, economic, human interest, and morality frames drive news sharing,” Journal of Communication, (67:5):803-826.
Walsham, G. (1995). “Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method,” European Journal of Information Systems, (4:2):74-81.
Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2018). “Thinking about ‘information disorder’: formats of misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information,” Ireton, Cherilyn; Posetti, Julie. Journalism, ‘fake news’ and disinformation. Paris: Unesco, 43-54.
Zhou, L. and Zhang, D. (2007). “An ontology-supported misinformation model: Toward a digital misinformation library,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, (37:5):804-813.